LEA Reply Yard Management
5.6#15 in dock scheduling softwareWeb
VisitLEA Reply Yard Management vs ProDocks
What both publish
| Fact | LEA Reply Yard Management | ProDocks |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | LEA Reply's FAQ says its platform provides REST APIs for integration with systems such as ERP, TMS, BI tools, and automation platforms, with integrations managed by Logistics Reply or customers. | The features page describes a REST API for WMS, TMS, and ERP integration and webhooks for real-time status updates. |
| Privacy | The product page states that registration management complies with GDPR provisions. | The privacy policy says payment processing is handled by Stripe and ProDocks does not store full payment card numbers on its systems. |
| Support | The SaaS service includes AMS support, with a standard service level and an option for tailored 24/7 support. | The privacy policy provides [email protected] for privacy requests and lists Productiv, Inc. in Midlothian, Virginia. |
LEA Reply Yard Management plans
- LEA Reply Yard ManagementPriced on request
ProDocks plans
- FreeFree
- Multi-Warehouse$25 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick LEA Reply Yard Management if…
It is intended for companies managing yard operations and coordinating carriers, yard operators, vehicles, docks, trailers and containers. Its configurable sites and warehouse environments may suit supply chain operations across multiple locations.
Pick ProDocks if…
ProDocks is aimed at lean warehouse and receiving teams, including operations handling roughly 5–15 trucks per day. It may fit teams that need carrier self-service booking and visibility into dock activity.