LASER AI
7.6#2 in ai literature review softwareFrom $3,000 a yearAndroidiOSWeb
VisitLASER AI vs SyRF
What both publish
| Fact | LASER AI | SyRF |
|---|---|---|
| Data extraction | AI suggestions link extracted values to PDF sources, and users can accept, edit, or reject them. | Data extraction for graphs requires enabling data extraction alongside annotation in a project stage. |
| Intended users | The maker presents plans for research teams, clinical research organizations, and companies. | SyRF is intended for researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies. |
| Purpose | LASER AI is an AI-supported platform for accelerating literature reviews and evidence synthesis. | SyRF supports evidence synthesis and systematic reviews of preclinical research, including storing extracted data and providing educational resources and guidance. |
| Screening | It ranks records by estimated likelihood of meeting inclusion criteria and offers a customizable focus mode. | Reviewers can screen studies against project inclusion and exclusion criteria, with two independent screeners and a third reviewer for disagreements by default. |
| Support | GetApp lists email/help desk, phone support, knowledge base and FAQ/forum support, plus live online, webinar, documentation and video training. | The guide directs users to contact the SyRF Help Desk for help with manual screening-disagreement reconciliation. |
LASER AI plans
- Per project$3,000, paid once
- Per user$3,000 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
SyRF plans
- SyRFFree
Pick LASER AI if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick SyRF if…
SyRF is intended for researchers conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies. Its collaborative workflow and data exports may suit teams that need to screen studies and analyze extracted results.