LASER AI
7.6#2 in ai literature review softwareFrom $3,000 a yearAndroidiOSWeb
VisitLASER AI vs RevMan
What both publish
| Fact | LASER AI | RevMan |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | The official knowledge base covers project setup, screening, extraction, reference management, reusable resources, permissions, AI functions and exports. | The Knowledge Base covers data workflow, analyses, text editing, exporting, validation, version comparison, publishing, portfolio and administration. |
| Integrations | GetApp lists third-party integrations as a supported feature and rates that feature 5.0 from one review. | RevMan can import study data and references from Covidence, and RIS reference imports can use data from Crossref, PubMed, or CRS. |
| Intended users | The maker presents plans for research teams, clinical research organizations, and companies. | RevMan supports diagnostic test accuracy, intervention, methodology, overview, prognosis, qualitative, and flexible review types. |
| Purpose | LASER AI is an AI-supported platform for accelerating literature reviews and evidence synthesis. | RevMan is Cochrane’s software for producing transparent systematic reviews, guiding authors from structured data entry and analysis through result visualization. |
| Security | The maker says LASER AI has FedRAMP LI-SaaS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 certifications. | Cochrane states that RevMan Web is GDPR compliant, hosted on AWS with SOC 2 Type 2 controls, uses 256-bit SSL, encryption at rest, OIDC single sign-on, permission separation, monitoring and daily backups. |
LASER AI plans
- Per project$3,000, paid once
- Per user$3,000 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
RevMan plans
- Practice reviewFree
- Cochrane author accessFree
- Individual student annual subscription£80 a year
- Student£80 a year
- Academic£100 a year
- Individual academic annual subscription£100 a year
Pick LASER AI if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick RevMan if…
RevMan suits authors preparing systematic reviews across its listed review types, including people working collaboratively on analysis and writing. The free practice option may suit someone who can work within its deletion, export, and single-user limits.