Kopia
7.3#38 in backup softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitKopia vs UrBackup
What both publish
| Fact | Kopia | UrBackup |
|---|---|---|
| Backup scope | file | mixed |
| Computer backup | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Ransomware protection | Yes | Yes |
| Restore modes | mixed | mixed |
| Restore options | Users can mount a snapshot as a local disk, restore a complete snapshot to a chosen location, or selectively restore individual files. | Files can be restored from the web interface, client or Windows Explorer, while volume images use bootable restore media. |
Kopia plans
- KopiaFree
UrBackup plans
- UrBackup core—
- Change block tracking for UrBackup Client on Windows€15.50 a month
- UrBackup Client for Microsoft Hyper-V 2.x—
- Infscape virtual appliance community editionFree
- UrBackup open-source server and clientsFree
- Infscape AWS/Azure appliance storage$0.01 a month
Pick Kopia if…
Kopia suits people who want control over file backups and their storage location, including users managing multiple machines through server mode. It is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Pick UrBackup if…
UrBackup may suit people or organizations seeking file and image backup across computers, mobile devices, and servers. The self-hosted core plan may appeal to those who want to run the server themselves.