EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

JuiceFS vs Longhorn

JuiceFS

7.9#1 in distributed file system softwareFrom $0.02 a month
Free planAPILinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
Visit
Longhorn logo

Longhorn

6.1#12 in software-defined storage softwareFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactJuiceFSLonghorn
SecurityJuiceFS supports encryption in transit and at rest; at-rest encryption must be enabled when creating a file system and cannot be enabled later.Longhorn supports mTLS to secure and encrypt gRPC communication between its control plane and data plane, but mTLS is disabled by default.

JuiceFS plans

  • Community EditionFree
  • Cloud Service$0.02 a month
  • Enterprise EditionPriced on request

Longhorn plans

  • LonghornFree

Pick JuiceFS if…

JuiceFS may suit teams managing shared or large data workloads across object storage, including users of Kubernetes or Hadoop ecosystem tools. Its deployment options also address organizations that want a self-hosted, managed, or enterprise setup.

Pick Longhorn if…

Longhorn suits teams running Kubernetes that need distributed block storage, snapshots, backups, or cross-cluster disaster recovery. It is aimed at users who can meet its privileged-access and NFS requirements where applicable.

Charts they share