JFrog Container Registry
7.6#1 in container registriesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitJFrog Container Registry vs Zot Registry
Zot Registry
6.7#10 in container registriesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | JFrog Container Registry | Zot Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Access control | The registry includes role-based access control for repositories and artifacts. | Zot supports identity-based access control with policies that allow or deny user actions on repositories. |
| Authentication | JFrog supports SSO, LDAP, Active Directory, and multi-factor authentication, with MFA supported on the SaaS solution. | Supported authentication methods include TLS and mTLS, htpasswd, LDAP, bearer tokens, and OpenID/OAuth2 options. |
| Integrations | JFrog advertises more than 100 integrations, including GitHub, Docker, npm, PyPI, ServiceNow, Wiz and Google Artifact Registry. | The feature summary names cosign and notation signatures, Helm charts, skopeo, cri-o, and Prometheus metrics support. |
| Purpose | JFrog Container Registry is a free, self-managed edition of JFrog Artifactory for container and Helm workflows. | Zot is an OCI-native container image registry that conforms to OCI Distribution Specification APIs. |
JFrog Container Registry plans
- JFrog Container Registry (JCR)Free
- JFrog Container RegistryFree
- Pro$50 a month
- Pro SaaS$150 a month
- Enterprise X$950 a month
- Enterprise X SaaS$950 a month
Zot Registry plans
- Zot RegistryFree
Pick JFrog Container Registry if…
JCR may suit teams managing container or Helm packages who want self-managed repositories with access controls and search. The free edition is limited to self-managed use and excludes several capabilities, including Xray and high availability.
Pick Zot Registry if…
Zot suits teams seeking a self-hosted container image registry, including for on-premises environments alongside Kubernetes. Its multiple storage, authentication, and policy options may fit deployments with varied operational requirements.