Iris.ai
6.1#26 in ai literature review softwareWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitIris.ai vs RobotReviewer
RobotReviewer
7.5#4 in ai literature review softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Iris.ai | RobotReviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Axion says it offers deployment via API, on-premise, or cloud, including private cloud deployment. | The project can run locally as Docker services, with a web app and API server exposed on local ports. |
| Integrations | The terms list optional integrations with Google Drive, Dropbox, and Microsoft SharePoint; Axion also describes connections to databases, CRMs, BI tools, and cloud storage. | The self-hosted setup uses Grobid for document processing, RabbitMQ and Celery for worker processing, and SciBERT through bert-as-a-service. |
| Support | The terms state that service support is available in English via email. | The project directs users to an email address for questions and integration assistance. |
| What it does | Iris.ai describes its platform as helping enterprises connect, orchestrate, evaluate, and deploy agentic RAG AI workflows. | RobotReviewer analyzes clinical-trial PDFs and automatically extracts trial information and risk-of-bias assessments. |
Iris.ai plans
- Enterprise (Axion)Priced on request
- Professional (Axion)Priced on request
- Starter (Axion)—
RobotReviewer plans
- FreeFree
Pick Iris.ai if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick RobotReviewer if…
RobotReviewer suits people analyzing clinical trial reports who need PICO annotation, likely bias assessments, or synthesis across groups of reports. It may also suit teams able to manage its self-hosted setup requirements.