iplicitPay
6.7#44 in accounts payable software£0.40 one-timeWebmacOSWindows
VisitiplicitPay vs Nanonets Accounts Payable Automation
Nanonets Accounts Payable Automation
8.3#3 in accounts payable software$100 usage-basedFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | iplicitPay | Nanonets Accounts Payable Automation |
|---|---|---|
| Approval workflows | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Headquarters | Bournemouth, Dorset, England, UK | San Francisco, California, USA |
| Integrations | iplicit’s API can connect external systems such as CRMs, e-commerce platforms, and custom in-house systems to exchange data. | Nanonets lists 25-plus native connectors including Gmail, Outlook, Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, SAP, QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk, Slack, Jira and Asana. |
| Intended users | iplicit describes the broader platform as built for growing mid-market organisations needing configurable approvals, multi-entity support, and built-in payments. | Nanonets describes its product as purpose-built for document-heavy business processes including accounts payable, and says it serves teams from smaller companies to Fortune 500 enterprises. |
| Invoice capture | ai | ai |
| Payment execution | Yes | No |
| PO matching | Yes | Yes |
iplicitPay plans
- iplicitPay usage—
- iplicitPay£0.40, paid once
Nanonets Accounts Payable Automation plans
- Starter paid usage$100 a month
- StarterFree
- EnterprisePriced on request
- GrowthPriced on request
Pick iplicitPay if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Nanonets Accounts Payable Automation if…
It suits teams handling document-heavy accounts payable processes, from smaller companies to large enterprises. Its ERP connections and approval workflows are relevant to teams automating invoice processing while retaining human review for exceptions.