INRA
5.9#30 in ai literature review softwareFrom $90 a yearWeb
VisitINRA vs LASER AI
What both publish
| Fact | INRA | LASER AI |
|---|---|---|
| Exports | Narrative reports export to Word, PDF, or LaTeX with source metadata in BibTeX or CSV; SLR Copilot exports PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams and study lists in formats including RIS, BibTeX, CSV, and Excel. | Documented outputs include PRISMA flow diagrams, extraction exports, flexible extraction analysis and report export. |
| Integrations | Users can add PDFs and supported Zotero or Mendeley sources to narrative reviews; SLR Copilot accepts citation files and full-text PDFs. | GetApp lists third-party integrations as a supported feature and rates that feature 5.0 from one review. |
| Intended users | The site presents narrative reviews for topic overviews, thesis backgrounds, and grant proposals, and SLR Copilot for team-based clinical and health-science reviews. | The maker presents plans for research teams, clinical research organizations, and companies. |
| Purpose | INRA provides AI-assisted workflows for drafting narrative literature reviews and managing systematic reviews. | LASER AI is an AI-supported platform for accelerating literature reviews and evidence synthesis. |
INRA plans
- Teams & Institutions$90 a year
- Professional$120 a year
LASER AI plans
- Per project$3,000, paid once
- Per user$3,000 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick INRA if…
INRA may suit researchers preparing topic overviews, thesis backgrounds, or grant proposals, as well as teams conducting clinical and health-science systematic reviews. Reviewers retain responsibility for screening decisions.
Pick LASER AI if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.