Inngest
8.3#1 in task queue softwareFrom $99 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitInngest vs Oban
What both publish
| Fact | Inngest | Oban |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Inngest describes itself as open core and says it released its event driven workflow product in 2022. | The makers describe themselves as Parker and Shannon Selbert, a small software shop developing, designing, and supporting Oban. |
| Data protection | Inngest says its databases are located in the United States, encrypted at rest, and its applications use TLS/SSL encryption in transit. | Oban Pro supports encrypted job arguments at rest; its documentation says metadata, error messages, and stacktraces remain plaintext. |
| Integrations | The documentation describes integrations for Vercel and Netlify deployment syncs, Neon database events, and Datadog and Prometheus monitoring. | The maker documents Elixir and Python packages, and says workflows coordinate directly through Postgres without a separate orchestration service. |
| Purpose | Inngest orchestrates asynchronous code as durable functions for event driven workflows, background jobs, and agents. | Oban is a background job framework for Elixir and Python, backed by a database. |
Inngest plans
- FreeFree
- Pro$99 a month
- Business$499 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Oban plans
- Open SourceFree
- Pro (monthly)$150 a month
- Pro (yearly)$1,620 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Inngest if…
Inngest suits developers building event-driven workflows, background jobs, or agents with TypeScript, Python, or Go. Its free plan may suit those whose execution needs fit within its stated quota.
Pick Oban if…
Oban suits developers deploying Elixir or Python background jobs in self-hosted environments. The free plan fits basic processing, while Pro targets teams needing workflows, limits, dashboard controls, and support.