EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Indusface WAS vs Oversecured

Indusface WAS logo

Indusface WAS

6.6#6 in dynamic application security testing softwareFrom $599 a year
Web
Visit
Oversecured logo

Oversecured

6.8#3 in mobile application security testing software$1,000 usage-based
AndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactIndusface WASOversecured
IntegrationsWAS can trigger scans on new CI/CD builds, create vulnerability tickets, and send scan logs to major SIEM providers.The platform lists CLI, MCP, REST API, CI/CD integrations, and webhooks for Slack, Jira, email, or custom endpoints.
ProductIndusface WAS is an AI-powered dynamic application security testing scanner for web application security.Oversecured is an agentic offensive security platform for mobile apps that combines SAST, DAST, and IAST with AI-assisted triage.
SupportWAS support is available 24×7×365 by email, phone, and chat on Premium; the page lists unlimited email support and business-hours on-call support for WAS.The pricing page lists email and site-widget support for Hacker and Business, and a dedicated manager plus Slack channel for Enterprise.

Indusface WAS plans

  • Advance$59 a month
  • Advance$599 a year
  • MSSP EditionPriced on request
  • PremiumPriced on request

Oversecured plans

  • Hacker$500, paid once
  • Business$1,000 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick Indusface WAS if…

WAS may suit teams looking for web application vulnerability scanning and remediation guidance, including those integrating scans into CI/CD builds. MSSPs and consultants may find the branded dashboard and reports relevant.

Pick Oversecured if…

Oversecured may suit teams assessing Android or iOS app security, including teams that need dynamic or authenticated testing. Its plans and deployment options include per-scan, per-app, and custom enterprise arrangements.

Charts they share