Imposter
5.7#17 in api mocking toolsLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
VisitImposter vs Mockfly
What both publish
| Fact | Imposter | Mockfly |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The CLI documentation describes embedding Imposter in JVM and Node.js tests, and using GitHub Actions or other CI/CD platforms including GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Azure Pipelines, and Bitbucket. | The Chrome extension captures browser requests and adds selected endpoints to a Mockfly project. |
| Intended users | The maker describes Imposter as a tool for developers and QA, including teams that want to decouple integration tests from cloud or backend systems. | Mockfly describes its users as frontend, backend, mobile, QA, and testing engineers who need shared mock APIs. |
| Purpose | Imposter runs interactive mock systems for development and QA, including before a real API is available. | Mockfly creates hosted mock REST API endpoints so teams can build and test before a backend is ready. |
Imposter plans
No prices published.
Mockfly plans
- StarterFree
- Pro€15 a month
- Team€49 a month
- Pro annual€150 a year
- CompanyPriced on request
Pick Imposter if…
Imposter suits developers and QA teams that need mock APIs or systems for development and testing. It may be useful for teams seeking to decouple integration tests from cloud or backend systems.
Pick Mockfly if…
Mockfly suits frontend, backend, mobile, QA, and testing engineers who need shared mock APIs. It is also useful for teams that want to import API definitions, automate mock management, or serve projects locally offline.