Harbor
6.1#19 in container registriesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitHarbor vs JFrog Container Registry
JFrog Container Registry
7.6#1 in container registriesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Harbor | JFrog Container Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Harbor supports database, LDAP/Active Directory, and OIDC authentication; choosing database authentication and adding local users prevents switching to another mode. | JFrog supports SSO, LDAP, Active Directory, and multi-factor authentication, with MFA supported on the SaaS solution. |
| Integrations | The compatibility list includes registry adapters such as Docker Hub, Amazon ECR, Google Container Registry, Azure Container Registry, and GitLab Registry. | JFrog advertises more than 100 integrations, including GitHub, Docker, npm, PyPI, ServiceNow, Wiz and Google Artifact Registry. |
Harbor plans
- HarborFree
JFrog Container Registry plans
- JFrog Container Registry (JCR)Free
- JFrog Container RegistryFree
- Pro$50 a month
- Pro SaaS$150 a month
- Enterprise X$950 a month
- Enterprise X SaaS$950 a month
Pick Harbor if…
Harbor suits teams managing container images and other artifacts across cloud native environments, especially those needing scanning, access policies, or registry replication. It is available as a self-hosted, Linux, web, and API option.
Pick JFrog Container Registry if…
JCR may suit teams managing container or Helm packages who want self-managed repositories with access controls and search. The free edition is limited to self-managed use and excludes several capabilities, including Xray and high availability.