EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Grype vs Uptycs Container Security

Grype

7.4#3 in software composition analysis softwareFree plan
Free planLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
Visit

What both publish

FactGrypeUptycs Container Security
Founded20162016
HeadquartersSanta Barbara, California, United StatesLexington, Massachusetts, USA
IntegrationsThe installation documentation provides a Docker image and lists community installation options including Homebrew, MacPorts, Winget, Scoop, and Snapcraft.Uptycs lists integrations including ServiceNow, PagerDuty, Jira, Slack, Splunk, AWS Security Hub, Amazon Security Lake, Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, and GitHub.
Intended usersThe project documentation describes individual package scanning as useful for lightweight vulnerability checks and compliance scanning of specific dependencies.The container security offering is described as helping developers and SecOps align on risk prioritization and remediation.

Grype plans

  • GrypeFree
  • Grype open-source scannerFree

Uptycs Container Security plans

  • Discover — Workload$36 a year
  • Discover — Cloud Workload$60 a year
  • Audit — Workload$72 a year
  • Audit — Cloud Workload$120 a year
  • Secure — Cloud WorkloadPriced on request
  • Secure — WorkloadPriced on request

Pick Grype if…

Grype suits developers and teams checking packages, images, filesystems, or SBOMs for known vulnerabilities. Its individual-package scanning is also intended for lightweight checks and compliance reviews of specific dependencies.

Pick Uptycs Container Security if…

It is intended for developers and SecOps teams aligning on container risk and remediation. It fits organizations running Kubernetes across listed cloud or on-premises environments.

Charts they share