groundcover
7.7#15 in log management softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebLinuxSelf-hosted
Visitgroundcover vs Pixie
What both publish
| Fact | groundcover | Pixie |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Bring Your Own Cloud deploys the backend in the customer’s cloud while groundcover manages it, and the UI is hosted by groundcover. | Pixie supports hosted and self-hosted deployments, and its Vizier data collection component runs in the Kubernetes cluster. |
| Integrations | Listed integrations include Kubernetes, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, AWS CloudWatch, Google Cloud Monitoring, Azure, MongoDB Atlas, Redis Cloud, Datadog, and GitHub. | The homepage lists Minikube, EKS, GKE, AKS, and self-managed Kubernetes environments. |
| Support | Standard support offers business-hours availability with stated response targets from under 8 hours for critical issues to under 72 hours for low-priority issues. | The project directs users to its Community Slack, troubleshooting guide, and GitHub issue tracker for help. |
groundcover plans
- FreeFree
- Pro$30 a month
- Enterprise$35 a month
- On Premise$50 a month
Pixie plans
- Cosmic Cloud hosted PixieFree
- New Relic CloudFree
Pick groundcover if…
groundcover suits teams monitoring production environments that need metrics, logs and traces. Its deployment options serve customers who want a backend in their own cloud or both backend and interface on their premises.
Pick Pixie if…
Pixie is for developers who need observability and debugging for supported Kubernetes environments. It may suit teams comfortable with Linux nodes and privileged kernel access for BPF installation.