Grid Vision
6.3#17 in inspection management softwareAndroidWebAPI
VisitGrid Vision vs HammerTech
HammerTech
7.5#1 in certification tracking softwareFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Grid Vision | HammerTech |
|---|---|---|
| Company founded | LinkedIn lists eSmart Systems as founded in 2012. | LinkedIn lists HammerTech as founded in 2013. |
| Company headquarters | LinkedIn lists eSmart Systems headquarters in Halden, Norway. | LinkedIn lists Melbourne, Victoria as headquarters, with offices also shown in Chicago and London. |
| Company size | LinkedIn places eSmart Systems in the 51–200 employee category. | LinkedIn lists HammerTech at 51–200 employees. |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Integrations | eSmart Systems says Grid Vision has prebuilt connectors and standard APIs for asset-management, GIS, ERP and custom-agent systems. | Prebuilt integrations include Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, CMiC, MYOB/Accumatica, Opal, Eyrus and Acumatica Cloud ERP. |
| Purpose | Grid Vision gives utilities visibility into grid assets by combining inspection data, imagery, and GPS precision into digital assets. | HammerTech is a construction safety management platform for safety, compliance, and site operations. |
| Rating on Capterra | 0.0 out of 5 from 0 reviews | 4.3 out of 5 from 55 reviews |
| Rating on GetApp | 0.0 out of 5 from 0 reviews | 4.3 out of 5 from 55 reviews |
| Rating on Google Play | No user rating or rating count is shown on the opened listing | 2.9 out of 5 from 18 reviews |
| Rating on Software Advice | No rating from 0 reviews | 4.3 out of 5 from 55 reviews |
Grid Vision plans
- Grid VisionPriced on request
- Grid VisionPriced on request
HammerTech plans
- Subcontractor accessFree
- HammerTechPriced on request
- HammerTech GOPriced on request
Pick Grid Vision if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick HammerTech if…
HammerTech suits commercial and infrastructure contractors managing multiple job sites and coordinating safety workflows. The company describes very small teams and single-project operations as a poor fit.