EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Google Cloud Managed Lustre vs JuiceFS

JuiceFS

7.9#1 in distributed file system softwareFrom $0.02 a month
Free planAPILinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactGoogle Cloud Managed LustreJuiceFS
POSIX compatibilityThe service is POSIX compliant so existing applications, tools and workflows can use it.The system presents object storage as a mountable file system with POSIX semantics.
Release newsGoogle documented general availability on July 8, 2025 with four performance tiers from 125 to 1,000 MB/s per TiB and capacity up to 8 PB at that time.Cloud release notes list JuiceFS 5.4.3 on September 22, 2026 with directory healing, replication metrics and mount/cache improvements.
SecurityData stored in a Managed Lustre file system is encrypted at rest, and data in transit to and within Google Cloud is encrypted.JuiceFS supports encryption in transit and at rest; at-rest encryption must be enabled when creating a file system and cannot be enabled later.

Google Cloud Managed Lustre plans

  • Dynamic (25 MB/s/TB)Free
  • Dynamic (25 MB/s/TiB)$0.06 a month
  • 125 MB/s/TiB$0.15 a month
  • 250 MB/s/TiB$0.21 a month
  • 500 MB/s/TiB$0.34 a month
  • 1000 MB/s/TiB$0.60 a month

JuiceFS plans

  • Community EditionFree
  • Cloud Service$0.02 a month
  • Enterprise EditionPriced on request

Pick Google Cloud Managed Lustre if…

It suits teams running HPC simulations, modeling and analysis, or machine-learning workloads that need a parallel file system. It is designed for users who can provision capacity and mount instances to Google Cloud compute services.

Pick JuiceFS if…

JuiceFS may suit teams managing shared or large data workloads across object storage, including users of Kubernetes or Hadoop ecosystem tools. Its deployment options also address organizations that want a self-hosted, managed, or enterprise setup.

Charts they share