GoodLinks
6.9#17 in read-later appsiOSAPIExtensionmacOS
VisitGoodLinks vs wallabag
What both publish
| Fact | GoodLinks | wallabag |
|---|---|---|
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes |
| Full-text search | Yes | Yes |
| Highlighting | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | GoodLinks can import links from Pocket, Instapaper, Pinboard, Raindrop, Matter, Readwise, Abyss, AnyBox, Reeder, Omnivore, and browser bookmarks. | The ecosystem includes Android and iOS apps, Firefox and Chrome add-ons, RSS readers, and community apps for Kobo and PocketBook. |
| Mobile apps | Yes | Yes |
| Offline access | Yes | Yes |
| Organization | Tags, starred articles, and search across title, author, description, and content help organize links. | The product supports tags, full-text search, filtering and article status such as unread, starred and archived. |
| Privacy | GoodLinks says it does not track users or their information, and nothing is shared online unless users choose to share it. | The hosted service says it is funded by subscriptions rather than advertising, tracking, or selling user data. |
| Purpose | GoodLinks saves and organizes articles to read later, including offline access. | wallabag saves web articles, extracts their content, and presents them in a clean reading view for later. |
GoodLinks plans
- Annual Feature Upgrade$4.99 a year
- GoodLinks$9.99, paid once
wallabag plans
- wallabag self-hostedFree
- 3 months€4, paid once
- 1 year€11 a year
- The ❤️ subscription€30 a year
Pick GoodLinks if…
GoodLinks suits readers who want offline articles, highlighting, searchable organization, and iCloud synchronization across Apple devices. It also fits users moving links from other reading services.
Pick wallabag if…
wallabag suits readers who want to save articles for later reading, organize them, and annotate them. Its self-hosted edition may suit people who want control over their instance and its data.