GitCMS
6.0#19 in git-based cms$49 one-timeWebAPI
VisitGitCMS vs Kiln
What both publish
| Fact | GitCMS | Kiln |
|---|---|---|
| Access controls | Workspaces can assign Editor, Reviewer, or Viewer roles and limit members to all or selected sites, with publishing permission configurable. | Site owners sign in with GitHub, while invited editors and members can use Google sign-in without GitHub accounts; editors can be scoped to pages or sections. |
| Integrations | The site lists ChatGPT, Claude, OpenClaw, Hermes, Grok Bot, and Muse as compatible agents. | Kiln works with GitHub repositories and hosts that redeploy on push, including Cloudflare Pages, Netlify, Vercel, and GitHub Pages. |
| Support | The maker invites users to contact the founder at [email protected] and lists [email protected] for privacy questions. | Self-hosted plans include community support on GitHub, while Fully managed includes priority support. |
GitCMS plans
- Early-bird site license$49, paid once
Kiln plans
- Open sourceFree
- Self-hostedFree
- Kiln Cloud$4.99 a month
- Fully managed$14.99 a month
- Concierge setup$399, paid once
- Concierge setup & tagging$399, paid once
Pick GitCMS if…
GitCMS suits teams managing Markdown or MDX websites through GitHub and a supported static-site generator. It is also suited to organizations wanting review-based publishing, role controls, and optional AI drafting.
Pick Kiln if…
Kiln suits people building static sites who want clients or other non-technical editors to update content themselves. It also fits owners who want edits retained in their own GitHub repository.