Font Awesome vs Material Design Icons
| Font Awesome | Material Design Icons | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | $4/mo | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Android, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Icon formats | SVG, CSS, SCSS, Sass, JavaScript, web fonts, SVG sprites | SVG, JavaScript, webfont (EOT, TTF, WOFF, WOFF2) |
| Style coverage | multiple | multiple |
| Figma plugin | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Yes | — |
| Icon font | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Icon Libraries. On Everything Xiaomi, Font Awesome scores higher on our published basis.