Font Awesome
7.5#1 in icon librariesFrom $4 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitFont Awesome vs Lordicon
What both publish
| Fact | Font Awesome | Lordicon |
|---|---|---|
| Customization | The web styling toolkit supports sizing, rotation, animation, stacking, duotone, and other icon styling options. | Users can adjust icon colors, stroke, speed, size, and animation settings. |
| Integrations | Font Awesome documents integrations and usage guidance for Vue.js, React, Ember, Angular, SCSS, WordPress, and Squarespace. | Official documentation covers Web, React, Flutter, WordPress, Figma, and Google Docs and Slides integrations. |
| License restriction | The support page says Pro assets cannot be distributed publicly in an open-source repository to people not covered by the license. | The Standard PRO license does not allow icons to be redistributed as standalone files or used as the core feature of an icon library or pack. |
| Product | Font Awesome describes itself as an icon library and toolkit with icons, custom icons, and Kits served from the internet. | Lordicon is an animated icon library with more than 47,900 premium and free icons for web, mobile, and content design projects. |
| Support | Font Awesome says every paid plan includes priority support from real humans. | Team PRO includes dedicated support. |
Font Awesome plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$4 a month
- Solo$8 a month
- Team$16 a month
Lordicon plans
- FreeFree
- PRO (annual billing)$8
- PRO (monthly billing)$16 a month
- Team PRO (annual billing)$39
- Team PRO (monthly billing)$59 a month
Pick Font Awesome if…
Font Awesome suits developers and designers who need icons in web projects or desktop design tools. Its packages, Kits, APIs, and self-hosting options serve different integration approaches.
Pick Lordicon if…
Lordicon suits designers and developers who need animated icon assets in several formats or want to integrate icons into supported tools. The free plan allows commercial use but requires attribution.