Flowise
7.2#1 in multi agent systemsFrom $35 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitFlowise vs Trinity
What both publish
| Fact | Flowise | Trinity |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The product site describes cloud and on-premises deployment, while the repository provides npm and Docker installation instructions and self-host deployment options. | Trinity can run on user-owned hardware, including a workstation, rack, or VM behind a VPN; the maker also describes deployment on Ubuntu with Docker Compose. |
| Integrations | Flowise documentation says it connects to 100+ sources, tools, vector databases, and memories, and lists LangChain, LlamaIndex, and Zapier Zaps integrations. | The platform lists Slack, WhatsApp, Teams, Telegram, MCP, and CLI channels, and exposes its features through an MCP server. |
| License | The sunset notice says Flowise source code remains on GitHub under the Apache 2.0 license and encourages teams to fork it. | The maker states that the whole open-source platform is licensed under Apache 2.0 and can be self-hosted for free. |
| Support | The documentation lists community support and vendor support including SLA support and consultations; the sunset notice says official core team presence in Discord and GitHub concluded on August 31, 2026. | The maker offers free live agent-building workshops every Thursday and links to Trinity documentation and a Discord community. |
Flowise plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$35 a month
- Pro$65 a month
Trinity plans
- Open sourceFree
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Flowise if…
Flowise suits developers building AI assistants or agent workflows who want visual design tools and deployment choices. Its scheduled end of life and cessation of feature development are important considerations for teams evaluating long-term use.
Pick Trinity if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.