EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

FileTime vs MyFileRunner

FileTime

6.5#5 in legal e-filing software$1.99, paid once
AndroidiOSWeb
Visit

What both publish

FactFileTimeMyFileRunner
Document conversionIts converter accepts documents including scanned PDFs, converts them to required PDFs, flags security features that could cause filing failure, and can resize, reorient, and make documents text searchable.The pricing page lists document conversion upon upload as free.
PurposeFileTime is an eFiling service provider for submitting court documents and electronically serving case parties through the eFiling Manager system.MyFileRunner provides legal eFiling, tracking, billing, and related case services for law firms.
SecurityThe FAQ states that the eFiling Manager system adheres to state and federal security regulations and meets Payment Card Industry Security Standards to protect filer and transaction information.The eFiling FAQ says MyFileRunner uses industry-standard encryption and compliance measures to protect information during filing.
SupportThe features page lists customer support hours as Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM.The company advertises free 24/7/365 technical support and unlimited training and filing walk-throughs.

FileTime plans

  • Basic Plan$1.99, paid once
  • Gold Plan$2.99, paid once
  • Platinum Plan$3.99, paid once

MyFileRunner plans

  • eServicesFree
  • Standard Self Service eFiling$6, paid once
  • File4Me Gold Tier$25, paid once
  • File4Me Platinum Tier$40, paid once
  • File4Me Diamond Tier$70, paid once

Pick FileTime if…

FileTime may suit attorneys and individual or firm filers submitting court documents in its listed jurisdictions. Its conversion, tracking, and reporting tools may help filers managing electronic submissions and service.

Pick MyFileRunner if…

MyFileRunner is intended for attorneys, paralegals, legal assistants, firm administrators and other professionals who file regularly. Firms needing eFiling outside Texas, California or Illinois may find its stated service coverage does not fit.

Charts they share