Ferrix
5.6#21 in terminal multiplexersLinuxmacOS
VisitFerrix vs RMUX
What both publish
| Fact | Ferrix | RMUX |
|---|---|---|
| Installation | The README says to install from source or Cargo for now and marks the Homebrew tap and crates.io installation as coming soon. | Install options include package managers, prebuilt installers, and Cargo; the docs say quick installers verify SHA256. |
| License | Ferrix is dual-licensed under MIT or Apache-2.0. | RMUX is dual-licensed under MIT or Apache License 2.0. |
| Purpose | Ferrix is a Rust terminal multiplexer inspired by GNU Screen and tmux. | RMUX is a local terminal multiplexer for persistent, scriptable terminal sessions and terminal automation. |
| Security | The README lists TLS 1.3, bcrypt password hashing, configurable rate limiting, role-based permissions, and read-only session locking. | During Web Share, shells and PTYs stay on the local daemon while the browser decrypts encrypted terminal updates locally; tunnels carry encrypted frames. |
Ferrix plans
No prices published.
RMUX plans
- RMUXFree
Pick Ferrix if…
Ferrix suits command-line users on Linux or macOS who want remote session access, snapshots, recording, and multiple windows or panes. Its documented experimental features may also interest users comfortable with unfinished capabilities.
Pick RMUX if…
RMUX suits developers who want persistent local terminal sessions or programmatic control through an SDK. Its browser sharing and access roles may also suit people who need to share a pane or session with others.