feKara
8.0#3 in school management softwareFrom $75 a yearFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitfeKara vs Skyward Qmlativ
Skyward Qmlativ
6.1#32 in school management softwareAndroidiOSWeb
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | feKara | Skyward Qmlativ |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | The maker describes feKara as used by small to medium size schools and colleges in over 40 countries. | Skyward describes its software as school administration software for educators and families, and Qmlativ as a system for districts. |
| Headquarters | Manchester, United Kingdom | Stevens Point, Wisconsin, United States |
| Integrations | The features page lists SMS integration and online classes integrated with Zoom, including meeting creation in the app. | Skyward lists integrations including Clever, ClassLink, Google Classroom, ParentSquare, Schoology SISConnect, and OneRoster; additional costs may apply. |
| Purpose | feKara is school management and ERP software covering admissions, attendance, exams, result cards, and school administration. | Qmlativ is an education management system combining student information system (SIS) and enterprise resource planning (ERP) capabilities for education teams. |
| Reporting | Reports can use configurable templates, scheduled generation and email or SMS delivery, including financial and management reports. | Qmlativ reporting supports custom reports, multiple views, scheduled delivery, and reporting on virtually any field. |
feKara plans
- DemoFree
- FreeFree
- Professional$10 a month
- Enterprise$20.95 a month
- Starter$29 a month
- Monthly Unlimited$39.50 a month
Skyward Qmlativ plans
- Skyward QmlativPriced on request
Pick feKara if…
It suits small to medium size schools and colleges seeking one system for administration, teaching, attendance, and student records. Schools needing local hosting can use a Linux-based setup, which requires Linux, Apache, and MySQL.
Pick Skyward Qmlativ if…
Qmlativ suits school districts and education teams managing student, family, and business administration. It also fits districts choosing among cloud, managed on-site, or on-premise hosting.