EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

FactGuard vs Groundery

FactGuard logo

FactGuard

7.6#1 in ai fact-checking toolsFrom $36.99 a year
Free planiOSWebAPI
Visit

Groundery

6.5#12 in ai fact-checking toolsFrom $599 a month
Free planWebExtension
Visit

What both publish

FactFactGuardGroundery
IntegrationsFactGuard describes an early-access MCP server for Claude, Cursor, or any MCP host, and a Fact-Check API with a stated free tier of 100 calls per day.Groundery lists Deepgram for audio transcription, OpenAI for transcript claim extraction, Vercel for hosting and blob storage, Clerk for authentication, and Neon for its managed PostgreSQL database.
PurposeFactGuard checks claims, headlines, or URLs and returns a verdict with reasoning and cited sources.Groundery listens to debates, interviews, or streams, extracts factual claims as they are spoken, and checks them against selected sources.
SecurityThe privacy policy lists TLS in transit, Firebase App Check, cryptographic nonces for Sign in with Apple, and password hashing by its authentication provider as security measures.Groundery's privacy policy says it uses TLS/SSL encryption in transit, encrypted storage, secure authentication, and access controls.
SupportSupport is provided by email, with the support page estimating a response within one to two business days.The Pro plan includes priority support, while Enterprise includes dedicated support and an SLA.

FactGuard plans

  • FreeFree
  • Free / Dev APIFree
  • FactGuard Pro Monthly$4.99 a month
  • FactGuard Pro, Monthly$4.99 a month
  • FactGuard Pro Annual$36.99 a year
  • FactGuard Pro, Annual$36.99 a year

Groundery plans

  • FreeFree
  • Pro$599 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick FactGuard if…

FactGuard may suit readers who want claim checks accompanied by reasoning, citations, and a confidence score. Its API and early-access MCP server may interest people seeking integrations, though API access and team pricing are under development.

Pick Groundery if…

Groundery is aimed at newsroom and editorial teams checking debates, interviews, live shows, podcasts, and other material. It may suit reviewers who need timestamped claims and source links, provided they treat AI findings as informational aids.

Charts they share