EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

EnCo SOX ATA vs ThreatTree

ThreatTree

6.6#4 in threat modeling softwareFrom $29 a month
Free planWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactEnCo SOX ATAThreatTree
CollaborationThe product page says analyses use a central database and support multi-user collaboration, change history and progress tracking.The product supports owner, editor, and viewer roles for invited team members.
HeadquartersHamburg, GermanyUnited Kingdom
IntegrationsEnCo lists integrations with codebeamer, PTC Windchill, Jama Connect, IBM DOORS, Jira, and Polarion; its integrations page labels Jira as coming soon.The Enterprise plan lists custom Jira and ServiceNow ticketing, Terraform/OpenAPI architecture import, Splunk and Microsoft Sentinel feeds, GRC platform sync, and Confluence/Notion embeds.
Intended usersEnCo describes SOX as a safety and security engineering workbench for multidisciplinary engineering teams and says the company serves automotive, plant engineering, rail, and aerospace industries.ThreatTree describes itself as a browser-based tool for security teams ranging from solo consultants to CISO organizations.
PurposeATA is a top-down method for identifying attack paths from a point of attack to a threat and analyzing those paths.ThreatTree organizes threat models into forests containing Data Flow Diagrams and Attack Trees.
SupportSOX and licensing queries are handled through EnCo’s Service Desk, which requires registration and active customer status.The pricing page lists priority support with Pro and dedicated support and an SLA with Enterprise.

EnCo SOX ATA plans

No prices published.

ThreatTree plans

  • FreeFree
  • Pro$29 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick EnCo SOX ATA if…

It suits engineering teams assessing cybersecurity threats in automotive, plant engineering, rail or aerospace projects. Teams looking for linked attack-tree and TARA analysis, traceability and shared project work may find its features relevant.

Pick ThreatTree if…

ThreatTree is intended for security teams ranging from solo consultants to CISO organizations. It may suit teams that need structured threat models, risk prioritization, and collaborative review.

Charts they share