EnCo SOX ATA
5.9#15 in threat modeling softwareWebWindows
VisitEnCo SOX ATA vs ThreatOpus
ThreatOpus
6.7#3 in threat modeling softwareFrom £129.99 a monthFree planWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | EnCo SOX ATA | ThreatOpus |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | EnCo lists integrations with codebeamer, PTC Windchill, Jama Connect, IBM DOORS, Jira, and Polarion; its integrations page labels Jira as coming soon. | Listed source control and CI integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure DevOps, TeamCity, AWS CodeBuild, and Travis CI. |
| Intended users | EnCo describes SOX as a safety and security engineering workbench for multidisciplinary engineering teams and says the company serves automotive, plant engineering, rail, and aerospace industries. | ThreatOpus describes its intended users as security teams, security champions, and platform engineers seeking governed threat models and clear merge decisions. |
| Support | SOX and licensing queries are handled through EnCo’s Service Desk, which requires registration and active customer status. | The pricing page lists email support on Starter and Pro, and priority support on Pro and Enterprise. |
EnCo SOX ATA plans
No prices published.
ThreatOpus plans
- Starter£129.99 a month
- Pro£299.99 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
- Free—
Pick EnCo SOX ATA if…
It suits engineering teams assessing cybersecurity threats in automotive, plant engineering, rail or aerospace projects. Teams looking for linked attack-tree and TARA analysis, traceability and shared project work may find its features relevant.
Pick ThreatOpus if…
ThreatOpus is aimed at security teams, security champions, and platform engineers who need governed threat models and clear merge decisions. Its outputs support security work but are not a substitute for professional assessment or formal risk acceptance.