E2B
8.0#2 in sandbox softwareFrom $150 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitE2B vs nono
What both publish
| Fact | E2B | nono |
|---|---|---|
| Isolation | Each sandbox runs in its own Firecracker microVM and kernel, without sharing a filesystem or memory with another customer's sandboxes. | It uses Landlock on Linux and WSL2 and Seatbelt on macOS to enforce filesystem allow-lists that cannot be loosened after application. |
| Product | E2B runs isolated machines for AI agents, with the cloud infrastructure managed by E2B or deployed in the customer's cloud. | nono describes itself as agent runtime security with kernel-enforced boundaries for AI agents. |
E2B plans
- HobbyFree
- Pro$150 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
nono plans
No prices published.
Pick E2B if…
E2B suits teams building AI agents that need isolated execution, code interpretation, or desktop interaction. Self-hosting and BYOC are options for teams with those deployment needs.
Pick nono if…
nono suits developers who want to define and audit boundaries around AI-agent tool calls on Linux, macOS, or Windows. Its policy profiles and developer interfaces may fit teams that want to manage those controls alongside code.