EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Docketwright vs OBE Legal Intake Software

What both publish

FactDocketwrightOBE Legal Intake Software
IntegrationsThe site lists Clio, iManage, NetDocuments, Microsoft Outlook, and Google Workspace integrations.Published integrations include two-way synchronization with Clio, Filevine, and Lead Docket, plus Retell AI voice services.
Intended usersThe maker describes Docketwright as matter workflow automation for mid-size law firms.OBE describes its intended customers as plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams.
PurposeDocketwright automates conflict screening, engagement letter routing, and deadline tracking from intake through close.OBE captures and qualifies legal claimants, extracts source-cited evidence from documents, and prepares review-ready case files for plaintiff-side law firms.

Docketwright plans

No prices published.

OBE Legal Intake Software plans

  • Managed OBE$1,400 a month
  • Fractional Overflow & After-Hours Pod$1,450 a month
  • Polanco Dedicated Intake Pod$2,450 a month
  • SaaS Platform License$2,499 a month
  • Repository Ownership (legacy pricing page)$14,900, paid once
  • Single Practice License$29,000, paid once

Pick Docketwright if…

Docketwright suits mid-size law firms seeking automated conflict checks, engagement-letter routing, and deadline oversight in a web platform. It is also relevant to firms using the listed practice-management, document-management, email, or workspace integrations.

Pick OBE Legal Intake Software if…

It is intended for plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams. It may suit firms seeking configurable intake and document review workflows, while preserving lawyer oversight.

Charts they share