Cursor Bugbot
5.6#47 in code review softwareWebAPI
VisitCursor Bugbot vs Sourcery
What both publish
| Fact | Cursor Bugbot | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance | Cursor’s site lists SOC 2, ISO27001, ISO42001, and AIUC-1 certifications. | The company states that Sourcery is SOC 2 Type II compliant. |
| Custom rules | Teams can guide reviews with team rules, repository rules, and project `.cursor/BUGBOT.md` files. | Users can define project-wide review rules in a .sourcery.yaml file and use public rulesets such as the Google Python Style Guide. |
| Integrations | The docs list GitHub, GitHub Enterprise Server, GitLab, GitLab Self-Hosted, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Data Center, and Azure DevOps Services as supported repository connections. | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Jira |
Cursor Bugbot plans
- Individual—
- Teams—
Sourcery plans
- Open SourceFree
- Pro$12 a month
- Team$24 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Cursor Bugbot if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Sourcery if…
Sourcery may suit developers and teams seeking automated pull request reviews and security checks across supported Git hosts. Its IDE extension and deployment options also serve users who want code review within their development workflow.