Cordial
8.7#1 in grammar checkersFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebExtension
VisitCordial vs Harper
What both publish
| Fact | Cordial | Harper |
|---|---|---|
| Browser extension | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop app | Yes | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | Official pages list Outlook, Gmail, Chrome, Edge, Teams, Word, LinkedIn, Facebook, WhatsApp and X/Twitter integrations. | The maker lists browser and editor extensions, a language server, a JavaScript library, a Rust crate, and native apps. |
| Maker size | LinkedIn lists Synapse Développement as a privately held software company with 11–50 employees. | LinkedIn lists Automattic in the 1,001–5,000 employee size range and says it has more than 1,730 employees across 92 countries. |
| Privacy | Cordial’s privacy policy says text submitted for correction through its correction tools is not stored on its servers. | Checks run locally; the maker says Harper has no cloud round-trips, telemetry, or LLM in the loop. |
Cordial plans
- Version gratuite en ligneFree
- Cordial Web particulier€4.90 a month
- Individuel€6 a month
- Entreprises multilicence€8 a month
- Entreprises€8 a year
- Cordial Windows licence€79, paid once
Harper plans
- FreeFree
- HarperFree
Pick Cordial if…
Cordial suits individuals seeking writing corrections and style suggestions, as well as businesses that want tailored reformulations and team writing support. Windows and browser-extension users can access it, but it is not compatible with macOS.
Pick Harper if…
Harper suits writers seeking grammar and spelling checks with style suggestions, especially those who want web, browser-extension, or desktop access. Its single supported language makes it a fit for users who need that language coverage.