CoffeeScript
6.1#17 in code transpilersWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCoffeeScript vs SWC
What both publish
| Fact | CoffeeScript | SWC |
|---|---|---|
| Browser use | The core compiler does not depend on Node and can run in any JavaScript environment, including a browser. | The @swc/wasm-web module can synchronously transform code inside a browser using WebAssembly. |
| Compatibility | CoffeeScript can use existing JavaScript libraries, and JavaScript can use CoffeeScript libraries. | SWC's compilation is intended to support all ECMAScript features, and its migration guide says it supports stage 3 proposals and preset-env, including bugfix transforms. |
| Integrations | The compiler supports Babel transpilation, and the site lists Gulp, Webpack, Grunt, and Broccoli as build-chain options. | The site names Next.js, Parcel, and Deno as tools that use SWC. |
| Purpose | CoffeeScript is a language that compiles into JavaScript. | SWC is an extensible Rust-based platform for fast developer tools that can compile and bundle JavaScript and TypeScript. |
CoffeeScript plans
No prices published.
SWC plans
- SWCFree
Pick CoffeeScript if…
CoffeeScript suits developers who want to write code that compiles to JavaScript and use JavaScript libraries in either direction. It may also suit users who need a command-line compiler, source maps, or an interactive REPL.
Pick SWC if…
SWC suits developers and build-tool authors working with JavaScript or TypeScript. It is also relevant to teams seeking compiler integrations with tools such as webpack, Rspack, or Jest.