CodeRabbit
7.5#7 in ai code review toolsFree planFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
VisitCodeRabbit vs Sourcery
What both publish
| Fact | CodeRabbit | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Code retention | CodeRabbit says it does not retain source code after a review completes unless review caching is enabled; cached data is encrypted and expires automatically. | Sourcery says it keeps no copy of code after a review and does not use code to train models. |
| Company size fit | small, mid market, enterprise | solo, small, mid market, enterprise |
| Compliance | SOC 2, iso27001, GDPR, hipaa, sso saml, two factor | The company states that Sourcery is SOC 2 Type II compliant. |
| Deployment | cloud, self hosted | cloud, self hosted, desktop |
| Integrations | Pricing lists Jira and Linear integrations and support for linters and SAST tools; the FAQ says paid plans include 40+ integrations with linters and SAST tools. | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Jira |
CodeRabbit plans
- Open-sourceFree
- CodeRabbit Agent$0.40 a month
- Essentials$30 a month
- Team$60 a month
- Advanced$72
- Essentials$288 a year
Sourcery plans
- Open SourceFree
- Pro$12 a month
- Team$24 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick CodeRabbit if…
CodeRabbit suits developers and teams that want automated review feedback across pull requests, IDEs, or the command line. Its plans cover small, mid-market, and enterprise company sizes.
Pick Sourcery if…
Sourcery may suit developers and teams seeking automated pull request reviews and security checks across supported Git hosts. Its IDE extension and deployment options also serve users who want code review within their development workflow.