Codecov
8.1#1 in test coverage toolsFrom $5 a monthFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
VisitCodecov vs Tarpaulin
What both publish
| Fact | Codecov | Tarpaulin |
|---|---|---|
| CI integrations | Listed CI integrations include GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, Azure Pipelines, CircleCI, Buildkite, TeamCity, Travis CI, and others. | The README documents CI use with Travis CI, CircleCI, Jenkins, Codeship, Semaphore, Azure Pipelines, GitHub Actions, and GitLab Pipelines; it says Jenkins is the only one tested among Circle, Semaphore, Jenkins, and Codeship metadata support. |
| License | The gazebo server component uses the Functional Source License 1.1 with an Apache 2.0 license granted after two years, while the Codecov GitHub Action repository is MIT licensed. | Tarpaulin is licensed under both MIT and Apache License 2.0. |
| Purpose | Codecov provides code coverage reporting and insights to help teams improve code quality throughout development. | Tarpaulin is a code coverage reporting tool for Rust projects using the Cargo build system. |
Codecov plans
- DeveloperFree
- Team$5 a month
- Pro$12 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Tarpaulin plans
No prices published.
Pick Codecov if…
Codecov suits development teams that want coverage reports, pull-request checks, and test or bundle analysis in their workflow. It also fits teams seeking a self-hosted option or integrations with code hosts and CI platforms.
Pick Tarpaulin if…
Tarpaulin suits Rust developers and CI pipelines that need line-coverage reports from Cargo projects. It is also useful for self-hosted or Docker-based coverage workflows.