Codecov
8.0#1 in test coverage toolsFrom $5 a monthFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
VisitCodecov vs Coverlet
What both publish
| Fact | Codecov | Coverlet |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Supported code hosts include GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, GitLab, GitLab CE/EE, Bitbucket, and Bitbucket Server. | The project lists a Cake.Coverlet add-in for Cake Build and extensions for viewing coverage in Visual Studio on Windows and Visual Studio for Mac. |
| License | The gazebo server component uses the Functional Source License 1.1 with an Apache 2.0 license granted after two years, while the Codecov GitHub Action repository is MIT licensed. | The repository states that Coverlet is licensed under the MIT License. |
| Purpose | Codecov provides code coverage reporting and insights to help teams improve code quality throughout development. | Coverlet is a cross-platform code coverage framework for .NET with line, branch and method coverage. |
Codecov plans
- DeveloperFree
- Team$5 a month
- Pro$12 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Coverlet plans
- CoverletFree
Pick Codecov if…
Codecov suits development teams that want coverage reports, pull-request checks, and test or bundle analysis in their workflow. It also fits teams seeking a self-hosted option or integrations with code hosts and CI platforms.
Pick Coverlet if…
Coverlet suits .NET developers who need line, branch or method coverage across supported platforms. Teams using Microsoft Testing Platform should select its MTP package rather than the VSTest-based collector or MSBuild packages.