ClusterFuzz vs Mayhem
| ClusterFuzz | Mayhem | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | $236/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Input generation methods | mutation, generation, hybrid | hybrid |
| Target types | binary formats, HTML, JavaScript, browser DOM, native programs | Linux binaries; Windows PE binaries; TCP/UDP applications; REST APIs; gRPC APIs; containers; automotive vECUs |
| Coverage guidance | Yes | Yes |
| Crash triage | Yes | Yes |
| Execution mode | hybrid | hybrid |
| Supported languages | C, C++, Rust; potentially other LLVM-based languages | C/C++; Python; Go; Rust; Java |
| CI/CD support | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Fuzz Testing Software. On Everything Xiaomi, ClusterFuzz scores higher on our published basis.