Client Conflict Check
7.4#3 in legal conflict checking softwareFrom $199 a yearAndroidiOSWeb
VisitClient Conflict Check vs OBE Legal Intake Software
OBE Legal Intake Software
7.4#3 in legal workflow automation softwareFrom $1,400 a monthAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Client Conflict Check | OBE Legal Intake Software |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Software Finder reports that the vendor lists no third-party integrations. | Published integrations include two-way synchronization with Clio, Filevine, and Lead Docket, plus Retell AI voice services. |
| Purpose | The service provides attorneys with an online solution to identify and manage possible conflicts of interest. | OBE captures and qualifies legal claimants, extracts source-cited evidence from documents, and prepares review-ready case files for plaintiff-side law firms. |
| Self-hosting | The maker's public materials describe a hosted cloud service and provide no self-hosting package or deployment instructions. | Paid codebase licenses support private AWS, Google Cloud, on-premises, or dedicated-server deployment. |
| Support | Software Finder lists email support as the available support channel. | Support is described through encrypted Slack or Teams channels, sub-15-minute critical alerts, same-day calibrations, and engineering fixes. |
Client Conflict Check plans
- Solo Firms$199 a year
- Mid Size Firms$249 a year
- Large FirmsPriced on request
OBE Legal Intake Software plans
- Managed OBE$1,400 a month
- Fractional Overflow & After-Hours Pod$1,450 a month
- Polanco Dedicated Intake Pod$2,450 a month
- SaaS Platform License$2,499 a month
- Repository Ownership (legacy pricing page)$14,900, paid once
- Single Practice License$29,000, paid once
Pick Client Conflict Check if…
It is intended for solo practitioners and firms of different sizes that need to check prospective matters and manage conflict records. The plans list limits of two and 10 active attorneys, with custom attorney counts available by quote.
Pick OBE Legal Intake Software if…
It is intended for plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams. It may suit firms seeking configurable intake and document review workflows, while preserving lawyer oversight.