CAPE Sandbox
7.4#3 in malware analysis sandboxesFree planFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitCAPE Sandbox vs ThreatAnalyzer
ThreatAnalyzer
5.2#18 in malware analysis sandboxesAPISelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | CAPE Sandbox | ThreatAnalyzer |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | The documented architecture runs each analysis in a fresh isolated virtual machine; GNU/Linux, preferably Ubuntu LTS, is the recommended host, with Windows 10 or Windows 11 23H2 as the recommended guest. | Listed deployment options include fully managed or customer managed GCP instances, on-premises deployment, custom software installation, and Docker containers. |
| Integrations | The documentation covers integrations with Box-js, LibreNMS, and Suricata, and describes CAPE's modular design for integrating external services. | The page identifies a REST API and Python and C-based SDKs, but does not name third-party integrations. |
CAPE Sandbox plans
- CAPE SandboxFree
- Public demonstration instanceFree
ThreatAnalyzer plans
- Custom deploymentPriced on request
Pick CAPE Sandbox if…
CAPE suits security teams and researchers who need to inspect suspicious files and automate analysis. It requires users to manage a host-and-guest deployment and take responsibility for using the tool.
Pick ThreatAnalyzer if…
ThreatAnalyzer suits security teams needing customizable malware analysis and workflow automation. It is aimed at threat investigations and email or endpoint protection.