EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

CalendarRules vs eLaw Case Tracking

What both publish

FactCalendarRuleseLaw Case Tracking
Founded20071987
HeadquartersWilmington, Delaware, USAHouston, Texas, United States
IntegrationsThe maker lists integrations with legal and case-management systems including Clio, Outlook, Google, MerusCase, and DocketCalendar.The product page names Litify, SmartAdvocate, TrialWorks, Clio, Filevine, and Neos among its case management integrations.
PurposeCalendarRules automates court-rule-based calendaring for law firms by turning court rules into critical dates and deadlines.eLaw provides web-based docketing and calendaring software to search, monitor, and manage active and archived cases, dockets, and court calendars.
SupportCustomers can submit rule-content and deadline-calculation questions to the Rules Team; the maker says it cannot provide legal advice.The eLaw product page lists an eLaw Case Tracking service line at 877-204-4250.

CalendarRules plans

  • CalendarRules subscriptionPriced on request

eLaw Case Tracking plans

  • eWatch — Florida Circuit Courts$3.50 a month
  • eWatch — New York State Supreme and Civil Courts$5 a month
  • Appellate eWatch$14 a month
  • eWatch — New York State Supreme and Civil Courts, lifetime$54, paid once
  • eDocket$84 a month

Pick CalendarRules if…

CalendarRules is suited to law firms and government agencies that need court deadlines managed across jurisdictions. Its rule-set selection and dual-entry workflow may fit firms of different sizes.

Pick eLaw Case Tracking if…

eLaw Case Tracking is aimed at law firms, insurance companies, and corporations that need docket monitoring, calendar syncing, and case reports. Its listed coverage and update schedule may matter to teams working across jurisdictions.

Charts they share