EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Caddi vs OBE Legal Intake Software

Caddi

7.3#5 in legal conflict checking softwareFrom $250 a month
Free planWebAPIExtension
Visit

What both publish

FactCaddiOBE Legal Intake Software
IntegrationsThe integrations page lists 70+ live connectors and says connectors for public APIs can be built within 24 hours of a request.Published integrations include two-way synchronization with Clio, Filevine, and Lead Docket, plus Retell AI voice services.
PurposeCaddi automates repetitive back-office work across the tools a firm already uses.OBE captures and qualifies legal claimants, extracts source-cited evidence from documents, and prepares review-ready case files for plaintiff-side law firms.
SupportThe help center offers Getting Started, FAQs, integrations, settings, and product update materials from the Caddi team.Support is described through encrypted Slack or Teams channels, sub-15-minute critical alerts, same-day calibrations, and engineering fixes.

Caddi plans

  • IndividualFree
  • Startup$250 a month
  • Team$250 a month
  • Business$6,500 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

OBE Legal Intake Software plans

  • Managed OBE$1,400 a month
  • Fractional Overflow & After-Hours Pod$1,450 a month
  • Polanco Dedicated Intake Pod$2,450 a month
  • SaaS Platform License$2,499 a month
  • Repository Ownership (legacy pricing page)$14,900, paid once
  • Single Practice License$29,000, paid once

Pick Caddi if…

Caddi is aimed at legal, financial, and other professional services firms seeking to automate recurring back-office tasks across existing systems. Its screen-sharing process teaching may suit teams without coding expertise.

Pick OBE Legal Intake Software if…

It is intended for plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams. It may suit firms seeking configurable intake and document review workflows, while preserving lawyer oversight.

Charts they share