EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Burkmak vs wallabag

Burkmak

6.4#17 in read-it-later appsFree plan
Free planAndroidWebAPISelf-hosted
Visit
wallabag logo

wallabag

8.4#1 in read-it-later apps$4, paid once
Free planAndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactBurkmakwallabag
Browser extensionNoYes
Full-text searchYesYes
HighlightingYesYes
LicenseThe repository identifies the project as MIT licensed.The wallabag source code repository identifies the project license as MIT.
Mobile appsYesYes
PrivacyThe product requirements state there are no third-party analytics and that content fetched server-side stays on the self-hosted instance.The hosted service says it is funded by subscriptions rather than advertising, tracking, or selling user data.
PurposeBurkmak is a self-hosted, multi-user read-it-later app for saving links, reading articles, highlighting text, syncing with Kobo, and exporting notes to Obsidian.wallabag saves web articles, extracts their content, and presents them in a clean reading view for later.

Burkmak plans

  • Self-hostedFree

wallabag plans

  • 3 months—
  • 1 year—
  • The ❤️ subscription—
  • wallabag self-hostedFree
  • 3 months$4, paid once
  • 1 year$11 a year

Pick Burkmak if…

Burkmak suits self-hosters, Kobo readers, and note-takers who want to collect articles and keep highlights in Obsidian. Its single-instance design is aimed at a limited number of accounts, not multi-instance high availability.

Pick wallabag if…

wallabag suits readers who want to save articles for later reading, organize them, and annotate them. Its self-hosted edition may suit people who want control over their instance and its data.

Charts they share