Burkmak
6.4#17 in read-it-later appsFree planFree planAndroidWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitBurkmak vs Gistory
What both publish
| Fact | Burkmak | Gistory |
|---|---|---|
| Browser extension | No | Yes |
| Full-text search | Yes | Yes |
| License | The repository identifies the project as MIT licensed. | Mozilla Add-ons lists the Firefox extension as All Rights Reserved. |
| Mobile apps | Yes | Yes |
| Privacy | The product requirements state there are no third-party analytics and that content fetched server-side stays on the self-hosted instance. | Gistory says it uses industry-standard encryption, does not sell personal information, and lets users export or delete their data. |
Burkmak plans
- Self-hostedFree
Gistory plans
- FreeFree
- Premium$7.99 a month
- FreeFree
Pick Burkmak if…
Burkmak suits self-hosters, Kobo readers, and note-takers who want to collect articles and keep highlights in Obsidian. Its single-instance design is aimed at a limited number of accounts, not multi-instance high availability.
Pick Gistory if…
Gistory suits readers who want to save articles, search their text, and read saved material offline. The free plan may fit readers whose summary needs and history window fit its limits.