BullseyeCoverage vs LCOV
| BullseyeCoverage | LCOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Linux, self-hosted |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Coverage types | function coverage; condition/decision coverage | line, function, branch, MC/DC |
| Supported languages | C; C++ | C/C++, Perl, Python |
| Report formats | HTML; text; annotated source code; XML; Cobertura; CSV | LCOV .info tracefiles, HTML |
| Self-hosted option | — | Yes |
| Historical trends | — | Yes |
| Coverage gates | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Coverage Tools. On Everything Xiaomi, BullseyeCoverage scores higher on our published basis.