BuildPulse
7.9#3 in ci failure analysis and flaky test toolsFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitBuildPulse vs Flakiness.io
Flakiness.io
6.9#5 in ci failure analysis and flaky test toolsFrom $49 a monthFree planWebSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | BuildPulse | Flakiness.io |
|---|---|---|
| Security | BuildPulse says it runs on AWS in the United States and encrypts data in transit; its page describes encryption at rest for object storage and DynamoDB while saying native DocumentDB storage encryption is still being evaluated. | The privacy policy lists encryption in transit, Cloudflare network protection, access controls, environment isolation, and monitoring; customers are responsible for securing self-hosted deployments and credentials. |
| Support | Team includes email support, Growth includes priority email support and a dedicated onboarding session, and Enterprise includes dedicated onboarding and priority support. | The pricing page lists standard support for Free and Startup plans and priority support for Growth and Enterprise plans. |
BuildPulse plans
- BuildPulse RunnersFree
- Runner 2xFree
- Runner 4x$0.01, paid once
- Runner 8x$0.02, paid once
- Runner 16x$0.03, paid once
- Runner 32x$0.06, paid once
Flakiness.io plans
- Startup$49 a month
- Growth$199 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
- Free—
Pick BuildPulse if…
BuildPulse suits engineering teams tracking flaky tests, coverage, and CI activity across repositories. It may be useful to teams that want to quarantine disruptive tests without adding an SDK or test annotations.
Pick Flakiness.io if…
Flakiness.io suits engineering teams tracking test behavior across commits in GitHub or GitLab. It may also fit teams wanting self-hosting or test reports with uploaded run artifacts.