Buildless
7.0#2 in build cache softwareFree planFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitBuildless vs FosterStack
FosterStack
6.6#8 in build cache softwareFrom $499 a yearFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Buildless | FosterStack |
|---|---|---|
| Intended users | The docs name Java/Kotlin, C++, Swift, C, and JavaScript developers as audiences for Buildless. | The product is aimed at teams using Gradle or Maven that want a self-hosted replacement for the discontinued standalone Develocity Build Cache Node. |
| Privacy | The privacy policy says Buildless will never sell user data and says nearly all collected data is kept encrypted so the company cannot read it. | The maker says the free core makes no outbound connections and collects no telemetry or usage data. |
| Product | Buildless describes itself as build caching as a service and a global remote build cache CDN. | FosterStack is a self-hosted remote build cache server intended as a replacement for Develocity Build Cache Node. |
Buildless plans
- Individual / OSSFree
- TeamFree
- BusinessPriced on request
FosterStack plans
- FreeFree
- Team$49 a month
- Business$199 a month
- Compliance$499 a year
Pick Buildless if…
Buildless suits developers using supported build tools who want to reuse compiled output through a remote cache. The docs name Java/Kotlin, C++, Swift, C, and JavaScript developers as audiences.
Pick FosterStack if…
FosterStack is aimed at Gradle or Maven teams seeking a self-hosted replacement for the discontinued standalone Develocity Build Cache Node. It suits teams able to deploy and manage a cache server themselves.