Browser Use
7.7#2 in headless browser apisWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitBrowser Use vs UseAgent
What both publish
| Fact | Browser Use | UseAgent |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, MCP, Python SDK, TypeScript SDK, Webhooks | The integrations page lists GitHub, Slack, Linear, Gmail, Notion, HubSpot and Google Drive, plus MCP servers and PostgreSQL. |
| Support | email, docs | Cloud support is by email and GitHub issues, while self-host support is through GitHub issues. |
Browser Use plans
- Browsers$0.02, paid once
- Browser Use AgentsPriced on request
- Browser agentsPriced on request
- EnterprisePriced on request
UseAgent plans
- CloudFree
- Self-hostFree
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Browser Use if…
Browser Use suits developers and teams automating browser work through hosted agents, browser sessions, SDKs, or self-hosted deployment. It is relevant when CAPTCHA handling, proxies, persistent profiles, and structured outputs are needed.
Pick UseAgent if…
UseAgent suits teams that want AI coworkers for research, reports, follow-ups, or recurring workflows. It may also suit organizations that want to self-host and supply their own provider keys.