Browser Use
7.7#2 in headless browser apisWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitBrowser Use vs Browzey
What both publish
| Fact | Browser Use | Browzey |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium, MCP, Python SDK, TypeScript SDK, Webhooks | The integrations page lists Notion, Google Sheets, and Slack, and says Airtable and HubSpot integrations are coming soon. |
| Support | email, docs | The site lists [email protected] for contact and support, and the Pro plan includes priority support. |
Browser Use plans
- Browsers$0.02, paid once
- Browser Use AgentsPriced on request
- Browser agentsPriced on request
- EnterprisePriced on request
Browzey plans
- Starter$10 a month
- Pro$25 a month
- CustomPriced on request
Pick Browser Use if…
Browser Use suits developers and teams automating browser work through hosted agents, browser sessions, SDKs, or self-hosted deployment. It is relevant when CAPTCHA handling, proxies, persistent profiles, and structured outputs are needed.
Pick Browzey if…
It suits Chrome users who want browser-based automation for research, forms, monitoring, scraping, or data entry. It is also relevant to users working with the listed integrations.