Bomly CLI vs Endor Labs
| Bomly CLI | Endor Labs | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | C++, Dart, .NET/NuGet, Elixir, GitHub Actions, Go, Maven, Gradle, npm, pnpm, Yarn, Bun, PHP/Composer, Python/pip/Pipenv/Poetry/uv, Ruby/Bundler, Rust/Cargo, Scala/SBT, Swift/CocoaPods/SwiftPM, plus Syft-backed ecosystems | C/C++, Go, Java, JavaScript, Kotlin, .NET (C#), PHP, Python, Ruby, Rust, Scala, Swift, TypeScript, Bazel |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Endor Labs scores higher on our published basis.