BAAT
5.7#164 in accessibility testing softwareWebExtension
VisitBAAT vs Welcoming Web
Welcoming Web
8.2#4 in accessibility testing softwareFrom $19 a monthFree planAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | BAAT | Welcoming Web |
|---|---|---|
| Automated scans | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD integration | No | Yes |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Manual review tools | No | Yes |
| Mobile testing | No | Yes |
| Security and privacy | The BAAT page says that a local axe.min.js file may be needed when CSP rules prevent automatically loading the file; it does not describe BAAT-specific security certifications. | The homepage says scan data is stored in encrypted environments, is not shared or used for marketing, and is handled under ISO and GDPR data protection practices. |
| Support | The maker directs users with questions or feedback to open an issue on GitHub. | The pricing page includes priority email support with Pro and a dedicated account manager with Enterprise. |
BAAT plans
No prices published.
Welcoming Web plans
- FreeFree
- PRO$19 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick BAAT if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Welcoming Web if…
It suits site teams seeking accessibility tools for visitors alongside scanning, remediation guidance, and monitoring. The listed website and workflow integrations may fit teams already using those platforms.